
The President of the Tax Foundation, Scott A. Hodge, has cast all of this in an international context, examining tax rates among the nations belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
In the U.S., dividend yields are taxed, first, as corporate profits (35%), second, as dividend income subject to federal taxation (15%), and third, as dividend income subject to state taxation (variable rates). The current U.S. dividend income taxation rate is 52.1%, placing the United States fourth out of all OECD nations, trailing France, Denmark, and the United Kingdom.
The Buffett Rule would increase the individual dividend income rate paid by millionaires from 15% to 30%, raising the highest dividend income tax rate to 62.1%. With the OECD average at 41.1%, the United States would have the highest rate among all OECD nations.

Why is this important?
Hodge argues that given the mobility and flexibility between markets, capital would move to friendlier climates. In turn, this will negatively the U.S. economy because the nation will not be able to compete effectively with other developed nations.
Let the discussion begin...
To read Scott Hodge's blog, click on the following link:
http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/27934.html
What can the rich do that most of us can't?
ReplyDeleteWell, one of the ways the rich got to be rich was by exercising their negotiating power. So, here is a thought experiment --- raise Brad Pitt's average tax rate 10 percentage points, what will do?
a) work less
b) negotiate a 10% increase in his cut the next time he does a movie
I think the correct answer is (b).
If so, what is the impact of redistributive taxes on income distribution?
The problem would only worsen.
Do you think this is just a theory?
Then study Latin American history.