Current Events

Loading...

Friday, January 13, 2012

Engaging in "class warfare": Let's target the real enemy in the 2012 presidential election...

Dissapointingly, Newt Gingrich's attacks upon Mitt Romney's leadership at Bain Capital smack of "class warfare," similar to but of a different stripe than the Occupy Wall Street crowd.

Attacking the 1%---the millionaires and billionaires---is easy, if only because they provide a very rich target (pardon the pun).  It's easy to exploit this target by asserting "Us vs. Them" and "Have's vs. Have Not's" arguments.  Yet, here's the former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives portraying the Us's and Have's as victims of such things as preditory capitalist vultures.


However, in an article published in The American, Steve Conover asks: "Are the 1%---the predatory capitalists---the correct enemy?"

Conover is no flower child but a vociferous proponent of engaging in class warfare.  But, Conover believes the battle lines should not be drawn with respect to income but whether an individual's wealth is earned.  Rather than wage war on the rich, Conover asserts, a "virtuous" class war would be waged on society's predators, pirates, and parasites.

Those Conover would target in this battle include:
  • Well-positioned rentiers leveraging their strategic position at a bottleneck in the financial system.
  • Wall Street firms employing high-speed data feeds into computers programmed to beat less-sophisticated market participants by using a trading technique known as "quote-stuffing."
  • Public-sector union bosses who are powerful enough to swing elections toward the candidates who will sit on the other side of the negotiating table, thereby bending the public trust to their special advantage.
  • Politically well-connected businesses that are able to extract government subsidies for their special interest and that are able to get their political friends to pass favorable legislation against competitive threats.


This would be a wonderful battle to be waged in the 2012 presidential election campaign, as the focus would be upon what Conover calls the "true heroes" of the nation's economy: the producers and earners.

The Motley Monk concurs.

Class warfare should defend and reward these individuals.  In contrast, the battle would target the members of the class which lives off of those who produce and earn.  Members of both classes exist at every income level.


Let the discussion begin...


To read Steve Conover's article in The American, click on the following link:
http://www.american.com/archive/2011/december/the-class-warfare-we-need

3 comments:

  1. Petrus EconomiusJanuary 13, 2012 4:38 PM

    Very disappointed with Gingrich's strategy. It will backfire on him. Hopefully, it does not backfire on country.

    ReplyDelete
  2. TMM is wondering if this is not "vengeance" as the media is report it.

    What if Gingrich knows he hasn't a chance at the Republican nomination and is seizing this as an opportunity to get Romney ready for the "big match" come fall 2012? Or, is putting out "insider" information that he's received from within the Obama camp?

    On the other hand, it certainly looks like vengeance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vengeance?? It is Incompetence....

    -Gingrich was Speaker of the House and blew it...
    -Gingrich was for less government until Fannie and Freddie gave him $$$$$$$$$ as a lobbyist
    -Gingrich was a conservative until he could mug with Pelosi in a commercial
    -Gingrich is a leader who couldn't build a primary organization to get him on all the ballots
    -Gingrich is still listening to the likes of Rove
    -Gingrich is a Bill O'Reilly 'convenient conservative'

    I have NO idea what Romney is other than a nice, rich guy

    I do think Gingrich is a not-so nice rich guy

    I do know that anything Gingrich throws at Romney will be nothing compared to the 'vengeance' of Axelrod, The Unions, NOW, Occupy and Soros in the Fall!

    ReplyDelete

The Motley Monk appreciates your comments. Please post them below: